From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Pull request: bluetooth-next-2.6 2009-06-08 Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090608.234701.51739911.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1244466304.24950.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090608.142440.129404475.davem@davemloft.net> <1244526163.3068.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: marcel@holtmann.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35407 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756197AbZFIGq7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:46:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1244526163.3068.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Marcel Holtmann Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:42:43 +0200 > Hi Dave, > >> > these are the Bluetooth patches for the 2.6.31 kernel release. They are >> > mostly cleanups and removal of dead/unused code. However we do integrate >> > with the re-written RFKILL subsystem now. This gives us proper soft-kill >> > support for internal and external devices. >> >> Where is the attached patch we talked about the other week >> so that your pull requests get tracked in patchwork? > > I thought you wanted it only for the net-2.6 pull requests and not for > the net-next-2.6 ones. Do you want them for both? If the diff is small enough to fit on the list, do them for both. If it's a lot of new stuff and huge, you can pass on it.