From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:49:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20090609054907.GA4106@ff.dom.local> References: <4A259EB2.5010500@gmail.com> <4A2620FD.8030708@trash.net> <20090603074049.GA5254@ff.dom.local> <4A262BE7.4090807@trash.net> <20090603095412.GC5644@ff.dom.local> <298f5c050906040650y31de6fdcv865e775d52bc977c@mail.gmail.com> <20090604193013.GA2755@ami.dom.local> <4A282216.20203@trash.net> <20090604194203.GB2755@ami.dom.local> <4A2DF25C.7030109@bigtelecom.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Patrick McHardy , Antonio Almeida , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Badalian Vyacheslav Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:61318 "EHLO mail-ew0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752038AbZFIF5G (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:57:06 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4842304ewy.37 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A2DF25C.7030109@bigtelecom.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:25:48AM +0400, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: > Hello! > Do you have any progress to apply this patch set? > I'm very interested to view that patches in mainline kernel tree. We > would like to use HTB for speeds more than 1G (converts 10 servers x 1G > to few with 10G intel multi queue network devices). Hi, I'll try to send patches today, but they are expected to work with 1G or maybe a little more. I'm not sure higher rates make sense without tso/gso, which isn't properly handled by packet schedulers anyway, so more time/feedback/testing will be needed to go further. Regards, Jarek P.