Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, tomek@jot23.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13467] New: Cannot set larger mtu on vlan then on underlying untagged device
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:34:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609143438.87e6bf5d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-13467-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:43:46 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13467
> 
>            Summary: Cannot set larger mtu on vlan then on underlying
>                     untagged device
>            Product: Networking
>            Version: 2.5
>     Kernel Version: 2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.i686
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Fedora
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: Other
>         AssignedTo: acme@ghostprotocols.net
>         ReportedBy: tomek@jot23.org
>         Regression: No
> 
> 
> I want to create vlan interface which uses jumbo frames while underlying
> network device is still using standerd 1500 bytes frames. So I tried:
> 
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
> qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# vconfig add eth0 12
> Added VLAN with VID == 12 to IF -:eth0:-
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0.12 mtu 9000
> RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
> 
> So I made sure that eth0 supports 9000 bytes mtu:
> 
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0 mtu 9000
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
> qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> It apparently does. So I gave it another try:
> 
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0.12 mtu 9000
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0.12
> 4: eth0.12@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 9000 qdisc noop state DOWN
>     link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> Now it worked. So lets decrease mtu on eth0:
> 
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0 mtu 1500
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
> qlen 100
>     link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0.12
> 4: eth0.12@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 9000 qdisc noop state DOWN
>     link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> It also worked.
> Now - if there is a reason which prevents me to increase mtu on vlan over mtu
> on underlyng device, the very same reason should have prevented me from
> decreasing mtu on underlying eth0 below mtu on eth0.12 vlan. This is a fault.
> 
> I started digging a bit in sources and there is one thing which rings a bell:
> vlan_dev_change_mtu function in net/8021q/vlan_dev.c:
> 
> static int vlan_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> {
>         /* TODO: gotta make sure the underlying layer can handle it,
>          * maybe an IFF_VLAN_CAPABLE flag for devices?
>          */
>         if (vlan_dev_info(dev)->real_dev->mtu < new_mtu)
>                 return -ERANGE;
> 
>         dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> 
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> My guess is that check in if() statement above is against currently configured
> mtu while it probably should check what physically device can transmit.
> 


       reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-13467-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-06-09 21:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-07-06 10:19   ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13467] New: Cannot set larger mtu on vlan then on underlying untagged device Herbert Xu
2009-07-17  2:30     ` David Miller
2009-07-20 14:36     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090609143438.87e6bf5d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomek@jot23.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox