From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, tomek@jot23.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13467] New: Cannot set larger mtu on vlan then on underlying untagged device
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:34:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609143438.87e6bf5d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-13467-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:43:46 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13467
>
> Summary: Cannot set larger mtu on vlan then on underlying
> untagged device
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.i686
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Fedora
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: acme@ghostprotocols.net
> ReportedBy: tomek@jot23.org
> Regression: No
>
>
> I want to create vlan interface which uses jumbo frames while underlying
> network device is still using standerd 1500 bytes frames. So I tried:
>
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
> qlen 100
> link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# vconfig add eth0 12
> Added VLAN with VID == 12 to IF -:eth0:-
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0.12 mtu 9000
> RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
>
> So I made sure that eth0 supports 9000 bytes mtu:
>
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0 mtu 9000
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
> qlen 100
> link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> It apparently does. So I gave it another try:
>
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0.12 mtu 9000
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0.12
> 4: eth0.12@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 9000 qdisc noop state DOWN
> link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> Now it worked. So lets decrease mtu on eth0:
>
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link set dev eth0 mtu 1500
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
> qlen 100
> link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> tkepczyx-mobl1:~# ip link show dev eth0.12
> 4: eth0.12@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 9000 qdisc noop state DOWN
> link/ether 00:0d:60:79:e0:9d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> It also worked.
> Now - if there is a reason which prevents me to increase mtu on vlan over mtu
> on underlyng device, the very same reason should have prevented me from
> decreasing mtu on underlying eth0 below mtu on eth0.12 vlan. This is a fault.
>
> I started digging a bit in sources and there is one thing which rings a bell:
> vlan_dev_change_mtu function in net/8021q/vlan_dev.c:
>
> static int vlan_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> {
> /* TODO: gotta make sure the underlying layer can handle it,
> * maybe an IFF_VLAN_CAPABLE flag for devices?
> */
> if (vlan_dev_info(dev)->real_dev->mtu < new_mtu)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> dev->mtu = new_mtu;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> My guess is that check in if() statement above is against currently configured
> mtu while it probably should check what physically device can transmit.
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-13467-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-06-09 21:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-07-06 10:19 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13467] New: Cannot set larger mtu on vlan then on underlying untagged device Herbert Xu
2009-07-17 2:30 ` David Miller
2009-07-20 14:36 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090609143438.87e6bf5d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomek@jot23.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox