From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] can: af_can.c use rcu_barrier() on module unload. Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090610.015245.141342130.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4A2D112A.4000308@hartkopp.net> <20090610.011027.43904351.davem@davemloft.net> <4A2F6D32.8030400@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: patchwork@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: oliver@hartkopp.net Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A2F6D32.8030400@hartkopp.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: patchwork-bounces+gcvp-patchwork=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: patchwork-bounces+gcvp-patchwork=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Oliver Hartkopp Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:22:10 +0200 > David Miller wrote: >> Otherwise >> patchwork doesn't pick them up automatically. > > IMHO patchwork should be robust against these type of typos and convert them > for the users (== your) convenience into 'Acked-by:' ... We really can't expect patchwork to look for every conceivable malignment of the various reviewer tags.