From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Robert Olsson <robert.olsson@its.uu.se>
Cc: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] fib_tries related Oops in 2.6.30
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:25:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090612072557.GA2761@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A31173D.6010504@gmail.com>
Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 06/11/2009 04:39 PM:
> Cc Robert Olsson.
>
> Jarek P.
>
> Yan Zheng wrote, On 06/10/2009 06:05 PM:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I pull linux-2.6.30 from linus-2.6 git tree. I got following oops
>> immediately after boot.
>>
>> # uname -a
>> Linux zhyan-cn 2.6.30 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 10 23:37:22 CST 2009 i686
>> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> ---
>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
...
Robert, probably I miss something, but since I don't understand this
last patch with preempt_disable(), I've looked a bit at this place and
found this parent update after IMHO possible child destruction quite
suspicious, so I wonder if you could check if this patch could change
anything with previous oops. (It's mainly to test the idea, not to
optimally fix it.)
Thanks,
Jarek P.
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index 538d2a9..565fc1d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -989,16 +989,17 @@ static struct node *trie_rebalance(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn)
t_key cindex, key;
struct tnode *tp;
- preempt_disable();
key = tn->key;
while (tn != NULL && (tp = node_parent((struct node *)tn)) != NULL) {
cindex = tkey_extract_bits(key, tp->pos, tp->bits);
wasfull = tnode_full(tp, tnode_get_child(tp, cindex));
+ tnode_put_child_reorg((struct tnode *)tp, cindex, NULL,
+ wasfull);
tn = (struct tnode *) resize(t, (struct tnode *)tn);
tnode_put_child_reorg((struct tnode *)tp, cindex,
- (struct node *)tn, wasfull);
+ (struct node *)tn, -1);
tp = node_parent((struct node *) tn);
if (!tp)
@@ -1010,7 +1011,6 @@ static struct node *trie_rebalance(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn)
if (IS_TNODE(tn))
tn = (struct tnode *)resize(t, (struct tnode *)tn);
- preempt_enable();
return (struct node *)tn;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-12 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-10 16:05 [BUG] fib_tries related Oops in 2.6.30 Yan Zheng
2009-06-11 14:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-12 7:25 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-06-15 6:53 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 9:32 ` David Miller
2009-06-15 15:25 ` [PATCH 2/1] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/1 v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-18 1:56 ` David Miller
2009-06-18 7:23 ` [PATCH 3/1] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-18 7:26 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090612072557.GA2761@ami.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.olsson@its.uu.se \
--cc=zheng.yan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).