From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Jay Vosburg <fubar@us.ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Subjec: bonding: remove bonding read/write semaphore
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:02:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090613050421.699009135@vyatta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090613050243.100086546@vyatta.com
[-- Attachment #1: bond-sema.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4631 bytes --]
The whole read/write semaphore locking can be removed. It doesn't add any
protection that isn't already done by using the RTNL mutex properly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2009-06-12 07:27:12.459766764 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2009-06-12 07:27:19.557928468 -0700
@@ -3489,10 +3489,10 @@ static int bond_event_changename(struct
{
bond_remove_proc_entry(bond);
bond_create_proc_entry(bond);
- down_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
+
bond_destroy_sysfs_entry(bond);
bond_create_sysfs_entry(bond);
- up_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
+
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
@@ -4015,7 +4015,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_devi
return -EPERM;
}
- down_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
slave_dev = dev_get_by_name(&init_net, ifr->ifr_slave);
pr_debug("slave_dev=%p: \n", slave_dev);
@@ -4048,7 +4047,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_devi
dev_put(slave_dev);
}
- up_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
return res;
}
@@ -5123,8 +5121,6 @@ int bond_create(const char *name)
int res;
rtnl_lock();
- down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
-
/* Check to see if the bond already exists. */
if (name) {
list_for_each_entry(bond, &bond_dev_list, bond_list)
@@ -5173,24 +5169,20 @@ int bond_create(const char *name)
goto out_bond;
}
- up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
- rtnl_unlock(); /* allows sysfs registration of net device */
res = bond_create_sysfs_entry(netdev_priv(bond_dev));
if (res < 0)
goto out_unreg;
+ rtnl_unlock();
return 0;
out_unreg:
- rtnl_lock();
- down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
unregister_netdevice(bond_dev);
out_bond:
bond_deinit(bond_dev);
out_netdev:
free_netdev(bond_dev);
out_rtnl:
- up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
rtnl_unlock();
return res;
}
@@ -5209,8 +5201,6 @@ static int __init bonding_init(void)
bond_create_proc_dir();
- init_rwsem(&bonding_rwsem);
-
for (i = 0; i < max_bonds; i++) {
res = bond_create(NULL);
if (res)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c 2009-06-12 07:25:18.155802980 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c 2009-06-12 07:27:19.558928513 -0700
@@ -44,20 +44,6 @@
/*---------------------------- Declarations -------------------------------*/
static int expected_refcount = -1;
-/*--------------------------- Data Structures -----------------------------*/
-
-/* Bonding sysfs lock. Why can't we just use the subsystem lock?
- * Because kobject_register tries to acquire the subsystem lock. If
- * we already hold the lock (which we would if the user was creating
- * a new bond through the sysfs interface), we deadlock.
- * This lock is only needed when deleting a bond - we need to make sure
- * that we don't collide with an ongoing ioctl.
- */
-
-struct rw_semaphore bonding_rwsem;
-
-
-
/*------------------------------ Functions --------------------------------*/
@@ -70,7 +56,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_show_bonds(struct
int res = 0;
struct bonding *bond;
- down_read(&(bonding_rwsem));
+ rtnl_lock();
list_for_each_entry(bond, &bond_dev_list, bond_list) {
if (res > (PAGE_SIZE - IFNAMSIZ)) {
@@ -84,7 +70,8 @@ static ssize_t bonding_show_bonds(struct
}
if (res)
buf[res-1] = '\n'; /* eat the leftover space */
- up_read(&(bonding_rwsem));
+
+ rtnl_unlock();
return res;
}
@@ -122,7 +109,6 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_bonds(struc
if (command[0] == '-') {
rtnl_lock();
- down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
list_for_each_entry(bond, &bond_dev_list, bond_list)
if (strnicmp(bond->dev->name, ifname, IFNAMSIZ) == 0) {
@@ -157,7 +143,6 @@ err_no_cmd:
return -EPERM;
out_unlock:
- up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
rtnl_unlock();
/* Always return either count or an error. If you return 0, you'll
@@ -253,7 +238,6 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_slaves(stru
if (!rtnl_trylock())
return restart_syscall();
- down_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
sscanf(buffer, "%16s", command); /* IFNAMSIZ*/
ifname = command + 1;
@@ -357,7 +341,6 @@ err_no_cmd:
ret = -EPERM;
out:
- up_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
rtnl_unlock();
return ret;
}
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h 2009-06-12 07:25:18.145850134 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h 2009-06-12 07:27:19.560013885 -0700
@@ -351,9 +351,6 @@ extern const struct bond_parm_tbl arp_va
extern const struct bond_parm_tbl fail_over_mac_tbl[];
extern struct bond_parm_tbl ad_select_tbl[];
-/* exported from bond_sysfs.c */
-extern struct rw_semaphore bonding_rwsem;
-
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
void bond_send_unsolicited_na(struct bonding *bond);
void bond_register_ipv6_notifier(void);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-13 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-13 5:02 [PATCH 0/9] Bonding patches for 2.6.31 Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] bonding: bond_create always called with default parameters Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] bonding: initialize before registration Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 4/9] bonding: fix destructor Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 5/9] bonding: fix style issues Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] bonding: elminate bad refcount code Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] bonding: network device names are case sensative Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] bonding: use is_zero_ether_addr Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] bonding: initialization rework Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-14 6:37 ` [PATCH 0/9] Bonding patches for 2.6.31 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090613050421.699009135@vyatta.com \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).