From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:37:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090615163706.GA9469@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A367255.5050604@itcare.pl>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:09:57PM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski pisze:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, jamal wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:19 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> This is only a sample but is not working
>>>>>
>>> It does seem to be working!
>>> How did you reach conclusion it wasnt working?
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Action statistics:
>>>>> Sent 42351 bytes 110 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 32 requeues 0)
>>>>> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>>>>
>>> 32 packets hit the policer - double check your parameters please to make
>>> sure they are correct.
>>>
>>
>>
> Yes. packets hits policer but second action dont drop packets.
I guess Jamal meant 'hit the policer' == 'dropped' (and 110 - 32
passed). So the question is how did you checked it's otherwise.
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 20:10 iproute2 action/policer question Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 11:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 13:32 ` jamal
2009-06-15 14:52 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 16:09 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 16:37 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-06-15 16:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 17:08 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 20:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-16 12:04 ` jamal
2009-06-17 6:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 6:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 6:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 9:01 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-06-17 9:26 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 13:09 ` jamal
2009-06-17 13:30 ` Andreas Henriksson
2009-06-17 19:43 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-18 13:19 ` jamal
2009-06-18 18:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 21:47 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-16 12:07 ` jamal
2009-06-16 18:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 9:33 ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-18 1:57 ` David Miller
2009-06-15 16:13 ` Paweł Staszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090615163706.GA9469@ami.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).