Re: iproute2 action/policer question

[Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:09:57PM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
> > Jarek Poplawski pisze:
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, jamal wrote:
> >>   
> >>> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:19 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>>>> This is only a sample but is not working
> >>>>>         
> >>> It does seem to be working!
> >>> How did you reach conclusion it wasnt working?
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>>>>         Action statistics:
> >>>>>         Sent 42351 bytes 110 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 32 requeues 0)
> >>>>>         rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>>>>         
> >>> 32 packets hit the policer - double check your parameters please to make
> >>> sure they are correct.
> >>>     
> >>
> >>   
> > Yes. packets hits policer but second action dont drop packets.
> 
> I guess Jamal meant 'hit the policer' == 'dropped' (and 110 - 32
> passed). So the question is how did you checked it's otherwise.

Hmm... Not that we don't believe you, but some other (tc -s qdisc ?)
stats with this would be appreciated before checking the code.;-)

Jarek P.