netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Van Hoof" <vanhoof@redhat.com>,
	"Clark Williams" <williams@redhat.com>,
	"Caitlin Bestler" <caitlin.bestler@gmail.com>,
	"Steven Whitehouse" <steve@chygwyn.com>,
	" Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>,
	"Neil Horman" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Nivedita Singhvi" <niv@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:36:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906161636.10522.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090611215341.GF22424@ghostprotocols.net>

On Thursday 11 June 2009 05:53:42 pm Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:09:22PM -0400, Paul Moore escreveu:
> > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 11:40:22 pm Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> > > index 791d71a..f9f1e20 100644
> > > --- a/net/socket.c
> > > +++ b/net/socket.c
> > > @@ -702,6 +702,28 @@ int sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
> > > msghdr *msg, return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> > > +			      size_t size, int flags)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct kiocb iocb;
> > > +	struct sock_iocb siocb;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	init_sync_kiocb(&iocb, NULL);
> > > +	iocb.private = &siocb;
> > > +
> > > +	siocb.sock = sock;
> > > +	siocb.scm = NULL;
> > > +	siocb.msg = msg;
> > > +	siocb.size = size;
> > > +	siocb.flags = flags;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = sock->ops->recvmsg(&iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> > > +	if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret)
> > > +		ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&iocb);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> >
> > Hmmm, in an effort to reduce duplicated code how about updating
> > __sock_recvmsg() to something like the following:
> >
> > static inline int __sock_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
> >                                  struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int
> > flags) {
> >         int err;
> >
> >         err = security_socket_recvmsg(...);
> >         if (err)
> >                 return err;
> >
> >         return sock_recvmsg_nosec(...);
> > }
> >
> > The only real difference is that now the *_kiocb() functions get called
> > and I have no clue if that is good or bad but it is different :)
>
> Yeah, gets clearer, like this:
>
> static inline int __sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket
> *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	struct sock_iocb *si = kiocb_to_siocb(iocb);
>
> 	si->sock = sock;
> 	si->scm = NULL;
> 	si->msg = msg;
> 	si->size = size;
> 	si->flags = flags;
>
> 	return sock->ops->recvmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> }
>
> static inline int __sock_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
> 				 struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	int err = security_socket_recvmsg(sock, msg, size, flags);
>
> 	return err ?: __sock_recvmsg_nosec(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> }
>
> static int sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 			      size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	struct kiocb iocb;
> 	struct sock_iocb siocb;
> 	int ret;
>
> 	init_sync_kiocb(&iocb, NULL);
> 	iocb.private = &siocb;
> 	ret = __sock_recvmsg_nosec(&iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> 	if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret)
> 		ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&iocb);
> 	return ret;
> }
>
> Better now? :-)

Sorry for the delay, I was away for a few days and just got back to email this 
morning ... but yes, much better now, thanks :)

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-16 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  3:40 [RFC v2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-11  9:41 ` David Miller
2009-06-11 15:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-12  0:00     ` David Miller
2009-06-11 22:58   ` [RFC v3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-11 18:09 ` [RFC v2] " Paul Moore
2009-06-11 21:53   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-16 20:36     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2009-06-12  7:26 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-06-12 14:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906161636.10522.paul.moore@hp.com \
    --to=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=caitlin.bestler@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com \
    --cc=steve@chygwyn.com \
    --cc=vanhoof@redhat.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).