netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>,
	"Linux Network Development list" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Henriksson" <andreas@fatal.se>
Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:14:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617061458.GA9412@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245153872.4018.14.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:04:32AM -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:52 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> 
> > I've tried debian squeeze (testing) with: iptables v1.4.3.2, iproute2
> > -ss090324, and action ipt -j MARK doesn't work. AFAIK debian lenny
> > (stable) uses 1.4.2. I've also tried debian rescue probably based on
> > lenny (with iptables 1.4.2), and it seemed it didn't work yet (I'll
> > re-check this). When you have something new I'd be glad for Cc.
> 
> I am suprised it broke again. 
> Lets CC the debian iproute maintainer. 

I confirm I can't get 'action ipt -j MARK' working on debian lenny
(stable) with distro's iptables/tc. I'm not able to compile tc from
vanilla sources properly either - configure fails 3 IPT tests. (I
admit I can miss setting some (undocumented?) config variables.) So,
with or without debian, IMHO iproute2 needs some updates for iptables
1.4.2, 1.4.3, and maybe even 1.4.4 now.

Cheers,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-17  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-09 20:10 iproute2 action/policer question Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 11:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 13:32   ` jamal
2009-06-15 14:52     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 16:09       ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 16:37         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 16:44           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 17:08             ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 20:07               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-16 12:04       ` jamal
2009-06-17  6:14         ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-06-17  6:28           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  6:45             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  9:01             ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-06-17  9:26               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 13:09                 ` jamal
2009-06-17 13:30                   ` Andreas Henriksson
2009-06-17 19:43                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-18 13:19                     ` jamal
2009-06-18 18:39                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 21:47     ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-16 12:07       ` jamal
2009-06-16 18:33     ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  9:33       ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-18  1:57       ` David Miller
2009-06-15 16:13   ` Paweł Staszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090617061458.GA9412@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@fatal.se \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).