From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Henriksson Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:30:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20090617133018.GA9928@amd64.fatal.se> References: <20090615111927.GA12316@ff.dom.local> <20090617061458.GA9412@ff.dom.local> <20090617062846.GA9764@ff.dom.local> <200906171201.37727.denys@visp.net.lb> <20090617092626.GA11005@ff.dom.local> <1245244194.4025.21.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jarek Poplawski , Denys Fedoryschenko , =?utf-8?B?UGF3ZcWC?= Staszewski , Linux Network Development list To: jamal Return-path: Received: from 78-82-252-13.tn.glocalnet.net ([78.82.252.13]:42116 "EHLO localhost" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764717AbZFQOND (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:13:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1245244194.4025.21.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello! On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:09:54AM -0400, jamal wrote: [...] > It works fine with iptables 1.4.2 for Lenny on my laptop. > It should work fine for the release after Lenny for 1.4.3 once > the debian maintainers pick up the latest iproute2. Do you mean the yet unreleased version? The latest release, v2.6.29-1, is available in both Sid (unstable) and Squeeze (testing) already and apparently people are having problems with it.... [..] > I have confidence the iptables people are more aware of the API > breakages now than before - so very low probability it will break > post iptables 1.4.4. [..] Proper .so versioning would be nice. -- Andreas Henriksson (...who only have sporadic internet access at the moment.)