From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090618.013410.04304670.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090618075446.890351000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com To: ursula.braun@de.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43093 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752470AbZFRIeH (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:34:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090618075446.890351000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ursula Braun Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:54:46 +0200 > Hendrik has built 2 af_iucv patches fixing inappropriate return code handling > for sendmsg. They are built against linux-2.6.30. We would like to see them > included in 2.6.31 - if possible. These patches do not apply cleanly against Linus's current tree nor net-next-2.6 which is what you should be subumitting patches again. This late in the merge window it really behooves you to do anything other than submit patches against the previous release... it's almost guarenteed to fail, really.