netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: "Denys Fedoryschenko" <denys@visp.net.lb>,
	"Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>,
	"Linux Network Development list" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Henriksson" <andreas@fatal.se>
Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:39:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090618183958.GA2766@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245331181.3876.11.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:19:41AM -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 21:43 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> 
> > You mean Lenny with not Lenny's iproute2, I guess. Does 'works fine'
> > include 'action ipt -j LOG'? Anyway, let's say you're right here, and
> > it's "Lenny's" problem.
> 
> I havent tried ipt LOG; Lenny cannot be updated anymore AFAIK; Andreas
> may be able to give you a better answer on their strict process.

I think I understand this strict process; I don't understand why with
this strict process there is buggy software maintained without any
notice (if it wasn't spotted before going stable, which is hard to
believe).

> 
> > Why do you think so? I've tried it with current (git) iproute2 and
> > iptables 1.4.3.2 (Debian include files are eq. to vanilla), and here
> > is the configure output:
> 
> I can almost bet you that you are linking to the wrong iptables library.
> Did you install the new iptables yourself? Lenny certainly doesnt run
> iptables 1.4.3.2. Note:
> It is not just the headers - you need to point to the right lib. It is
> a big mess.

You mentioned: 
> > It should work fine for the release after Lenny for 1.4.3 once
> > the debian maintainers pick up the latest iproute2.

...and I use this release after Lenny named Squeeze (or Testing),
with iptables 1.4.3.2, plus fresh iproute2 from git. (I guess, btw.
this is a process used by many admins.) OK, I'd gladly point to
the right lib, but where is it described? And why similar process
on Lenny with 1.4.2 and git iproute2 doesn't need such steps. So,
again: maybe it works, but if I didn't manage, Debian didn't manage,
and even Denys (who, AFAICR, can compile even Gentoo! ;-) mentioned
he gave up ipt - then it looks like at least a bit too complex...

> > 
> > After this I get tc compiled, but it gives misleading error messages
> > later (just like distro's tc).
> 
> Refer to above.
> 
> > > For other Distros: it should work fine if they have iptables 1.4.2/3.
> > 
> > The latest official version 1.4.3.2 (until today) doesn't work fine
> > for Debian & me (maybe we're special...).
> > 
> 
> Are you running something other than lenny?
>  dogo:~# iptables -V
> iptables v1.4.2

Yes, I mentionned it at the beginning:
> But... I'm neither able to configure/compile it with the current
> iproute2/iptables, nor test it with distro's builds (Debian testing).

info@ami:~$ iptables -V
iptables v1.4.3.2

> > I don't understand why you're defending those ugly destroyers of your
> > outstanding work?! (Did they threaten you? Don't worry - they're far
> > away in Australia... ;-)
> > 
> 
> Well, I have seen genuine effort to try and fix things ;->
> 
> > Just similarly to Pawel:
> > tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb
> > tc filter add dev lo parent 1: proto ip pref 5 u32 match u32 0 0 action ipt -j LOG
> 
> Thanks.
> I will make time and chase this.

I wish you that nobody dare brake it again!

Cheers,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-18 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-09 20:10 iproute2 action/policer question Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 11:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 13:32   ` jamal
2009-06-15 14:52     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 16:09       ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 16:37         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 16:44           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-15 17:08             ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-15 20:07               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-16 12:04       ` jamal
2009-06-17  6:14         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  6:28           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  6:45             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  9:01             ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-06-17  9:26               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17 13:09                 ` jamal
2009-06-17 13:30                   ` Andreas Henriksson
2009-06-17 19:43                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-18 13:19                     ` jamal
2009-06-18 18:39                       ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-06-15 21:47     ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-16 12:07       ` jamal
2009-06-16 18:33     ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-17  9:33       ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-06-18  1:57       ` David Miller
2009-06-15 16:13   ` Paweł Staszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090618183958.GA2766@ami.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@fatal.se \
    --cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).