From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: can we reuse an skb Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090620.224912.217086631.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4A3BC326.4090203@hp.com> <20090619.162957.156347025.davem@davemloft.net> <1f808b4a0906202241l1d74364ft52d99ecb6b0274f5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, radhamohan_ch@yahoo.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: peterchacko35@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:32788 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472AbZFUFtJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:49:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1f808b4a0906202241l1d74364ft52d99ecb6b0274f5@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Peter Chacko Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:11:16 +0530 > Here i am considering a special case where Linux stack is not used in > a host environment. Its dedicated packet processor. Application data > is not expected. (discarded if thats the case). Linux is a general purpose operating system. You can modify it for your own needs, locally, however you want. But upstream, we have to consider all use cases, not just your's.