From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [bug] __nf_ct_refresh_acct(): WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30 __list_add+0x7d/0xad() Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:47:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20090620154716.GA12901@elte.hu> References: <20090616.034752.226811527.davem@davemloft.net> <20090616105304.GA3579@elte.hu> <20090616122415.GA16630@elte.hu> <20090617092152.GA17449@elte.hu> <4A38C2F3.3000009@gmail.com> <20090617110803.GA10175@elte.hu> <20090618052356.GA18722@elte.hu> <4A39D778.9020607@cosmosbay.com> <4A3A0D45.8090806@trash.net> <4A3A5599.4080906@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , Thomas Gleixner , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41586 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753567AbZFTPrd (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:47:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A3A5599.4080906@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Patrick McHardy wrote: > Ingo, could you please try whether this patch (combined with the > last one) makes any difference? Enabling CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG > could also help. Mind pushing it upstream, and i'll keep things monitored over the week following when it hits upstream? The reason is, the crash ratio is worse than 1:1000, it took a day and a 1000 tests to trigger that one. I havent seen it after that. So it's going to be a very slow observation and you shouldnt serialize on me - giving you a 'it works' positive result will take 10,000 random bootp tests or so - that's a week or longer. (it can take a long time to hit that especially in the merge window when there's a lot of various test failures that cause hickups in the test stream.) ( Mailing me an upstream sha1 when all fixes in this area have hit upstream would certainly be welcome - i can use that as a 'no crashes expected in that area from that point on' flag day. ) Thanks, Ingo