From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: adding memory barrier to the poll and receive callbacks Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:14:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20090629181442.GF2742@ami.dom.local> References: <20090629140434.GE3845@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <20090629141445.GF3845@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <20090629173217.GC2742@ami.dom.local> <20090629180431.GE2742@ami.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jiri Olsa , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , fbl@redhat.com, nhorman@redhat.com, davem@redhat.com, htejun@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com To: Davide Libenzi Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com ([209.85.220.218]:38188 "EHLO mail-fx0-f218.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757745AbZF2SPQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:15:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090629180431.GE2742@ami.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:04:31PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > Btw., maybe I miss something but I guess Oleg proposed something in > between: inlining __poll_wait(), which would save us 'extra API' and > compiler doubts. (But I still prefer Jiri's choice. ;-) After re-reading I guess Oleg didn't proposed anything in between yet. Sorry, Jarek P.