From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default configurable Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090701.090849.31764824.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4A4B3F9A.9060105@trash.net> <20090701.090250.52376308.davem@davemloft.net> <4A4B8954.70803@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: markmc@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: kaber@trash.net Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59763 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbZGAQIn (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:08:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A4B8954.70803@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Patrick McHardy Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:05:40 +0200 > David Miller wrote: >> From: Patrick McHardy >> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:51:06 +0200 >> >>> I agree, this has already caused an endless amount of problems for >>> users due to the unexpected behaviour and, in some cases, bugs. >>> >>> Dave's point is certainly valid as well, until we change the defaults, >>> distributions can use sysctl.conf. But I think we should move towards >>> changing the defaults. >> You must do this via something like your suggestion, the >> feature-removal-schedule.txt thing. > > Yes, of course. But I prefer the runtime warning (at least on top), > my feeling is not many people actually read feature-removal-schedule. Ok.