From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: denys@visp.net.lb
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:20:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090703.132005.113285172.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907031402.34941.denys@visp.net.lb>
From: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:02:34 +0300
> Anyway, i ask advice from one of RFC authors. I will forward it here
> as soon as receive it.
Regardless of what this person says, I must bring up the most
important issue.
If we change this behvaior we have now, which has been present for
more than 10 years, we will break someone's setup potentially and that
must be considered strongly against all the other arguments.
I really never should have applied your initial patch, I severely
regret it. Thanksfully it's reverted now and we can look into
this issue more properly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-03 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-01 11:44 [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-03-13 23:02 ` David Miller
2009-06-30 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-30 22:54 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
[not found] ` <m1iqicyjmr.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
2009-07-01 9:00 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-01 9:42 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-01 17:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-01 18:12 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-01 19:01 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-02 20:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-02 20:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-02 21:22 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-02 22:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-02 23:03 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-02 23:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-02 23:46 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-03 1:38 ` David Miller
2009-07-03 3:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-03 11:02 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-03 20:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-07-03 20:37 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-04 0:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-04 7:55 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-04 15:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-04 15:03 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-04 21:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-04 22:00 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-04 23:22 ` Mark Smith
2009-07-05 0:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-05 0:28 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-05 6:16 ` Mark Smith
2009-07-04 23:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-03 1:34 ` David Miller
2009-07-02 23:13 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-07-01 2:27 ` [PATCH] Revert "ipv4: arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification" Eric W. Biederman
2009-07-01 3:10 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090703.132005.113285172.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).