From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: Soft-Lockup/Race in networking in 2.6.31-rc1+195 ( possibly?caused by netem) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:31:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20090706163106.GA4559@ami.dom.local> References: <200907031326.21822.andres@anarazel.de> <20090706141916.GA3477@ami.dom.local> <200907061813.29379.andres@anarazel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Joao Correia , Arun R Bharadwaj , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML To: Andres Freund Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:35950 "EHLO mail-bw0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753233AbZGFQbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:31:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907061813.29379.andres@anarazel.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:13:29PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: ... > > > Btw, I ran netem with delay for more than 48h on around 80mbit... That > > > does not exclude such a rarely triggered race, but makes it a bit more > > > unlikely. (With migration thats around 3sec or so) ... > Sorry once more. Andres, the bisection + the above - you did 'the whole lotta work' and you shouldn't be sorry at all! ;-) Thanks again, Jarek P.