netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netpoll: Introduce netpoll_carrier_timeout kernel option
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:23:17 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708122317.GA7837@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090708105902.GB6000@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 06:59:02AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index d77fbd8..9347f4a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -1531,6 +1531,11 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> >  			symbolic names: lapic and ioapic
> >  			Example: nmi_watchdog=2 or nmi_watchdog=panic,lapic
> >  
> > +	netpoll.carrier_timeout=
> > +			[NET] Specifies amount of time (in seconds) that
> > +			netpoll should wait for a carrier. By default netpoll
> > +			waits 4 seconds.
> > +
> I'm not sure the documentation still belongs in kernel-parameters.txt if you
> make this a module options, but thats just a nit.

There are other module options described in the
kernel-parameters.txt. Plus it's really a kernel parameter. ;-)

> >  
> > +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> >  #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> >  #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> >  #include <linux/string.h>
> > @@ -50,6 +51,9 @@ static atomic_t trapped;
> >  static void zap_completion_queue(void);
> >  static void arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb);
> >  
> > +static unsigned int carrier_timeout = 4;
> > +module_param(carrier_timeout, uint, 0644);
> > +
> >  static void queue_process(struct work_struct *work)
> >  {
> >  	struct netpoll_info *npinfo =
> > @@ -732,7 +736,7 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		atleast = jiffies + HZ/10;
> > -		atmost = jiffies + 4*HZ;
> > +		atmost = jiffies + carrier_timeout * HZ;
> >  		while (!netif_carrier_ok(ndev)) {
> >  			if (time_after(jiffies, atmost)) {
> >  				printk(KERN_NOTICE
> > -- 
> > 1.6.3.3
> > 
> I don't mind this functionality at all, but I'm looking at the code, and I have
> a hard time understanding why we bring up an interface here at all.  I get that
> we might want early netpoll access for netconsole or something like that, but
> looking at the console code I don't see where we buffer anything other than the
> standard dmesg log.  I don't see much reason why we can't just let normal early
> interface initalization from an initramfs bring up an interface like it normally
> does.

The earlier you bring the interface up, the earlier you'll able
to catch kernel oopses. netconsole is quite useful when
you don't have serial ports. The same applies for KGDBoE --
you might want to start debugging the kernel as soon as possible.

Sure, netconsole starts at module_init(), but looking at my dmesg,
netconsole initialization starts closer to the top of the log, so
it'll catch > 60% of oopses, i.e. all oopses in subsystems
that are below net/ in drivers/Makefile.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-08 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-08  1:00 [PATCH] netpoll: Introduce netpoll_carrier_timeout kernel option Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08  1:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-07-08  1:30   ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 10:59     ` Neil Horman
2009-07-08 12:23       ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-07-08 18:11     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090708122317.GA7837@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).