From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: therbert@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Receive Packet Steering
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:49:50 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090713.104950.121936768.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65634d660905032103h614225dbg9911e290f5537fbf@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 21:03:01 -0700
> @@ -758,6 +758,8 @@ struct net_device
> void *ax25_ptr; /* AX.25 specific data */
> struct wireless_dev *ieee80211_ptr; /* IEEE 802.11 specific data,
> assign before registering */
> + u16 *rps_map;
> + int rps_map_len;
>
> /*
> * Cache line mostly used on receive path (including eth_type_trans())
So essentially this table is a user defined (via sysctl) group of cpus
among which to distribute incoming traffic for a device, right?
Why not take this to it's logical end point, which is to monitor
transmits using a tiny flow lookup table, and map receives of the same
flow to the same cpu?
You can even "cheat" and not store the whole flow key in the small
lookup table, just use the resulting hash value as the key. Also,
if "best effort" is considered OK you can even do away with hash
chaining as well, further decreasing the space cost of the table.
If your goal is to steer traffic to the cpu on which the receiving
application is operating, that seems to me to be the only way to
reliably and consistently hit that target.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-13 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-04 4:03 [PATCH v2] Receive Packet Steering Tom Herbert
2009-05-04 5:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-04 6:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-04 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 17:28 ` Tom Herbert
2009-05-04 7:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-04 7:59 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-04 18:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-04 20:43 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-10 8:23 ` David Miller
2009-06-15 5:54 ` Tom Herbert
[not found] ` <65634d660906142252y6f7fc021l844b172995c10044@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-15 9:02 ` David Miller
2009-06-15 16:39 ` Tom Herbert
2009-06-15 23:18 ` David Miller
2009-07-13 17:49 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-07-13 22:04 ` Tom Herbert
2009-07-14 19:33 ` David Miller
2009-07-14 23:28 ` Tom Herbert
2009-07-17 2:48 ` David Miller
2009-07-17 18:05 ` Tom Herbert
2009-07-17 18:08 ` David Miller
2009-07-17 19:59 ` Tom Herbert
2009-07-18 3:54 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090713.104950.121936768.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).