From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Debounce code vs. dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu() and e100 driver. Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090714.140507.211725964.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090714.123848.189674670.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com To: khc@pm.waw.pl Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:01:54 +0200 > Maybe you apply the workaround for 2.6.31 and I (or someone) will > convert e100 to coherent allocs for packet descriptors, post-31? I think that's a good plan. Will give a few days for Intel folks to chime in before applying your patch for 2.6.31, but otherwise that's my plan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge