From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Phonet: sockets list through proc_fs Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090720.034328.193709571.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200907201247.23020.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <1248085261.4549.103.camel@violet> <200907201332.05329.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49033 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751789AbZGTKnX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:43:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200907201332.05329.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: "R=E9mi Denis-Courmont" Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:32:04 +0300 > On Monday 20 July 2009 13:21:01 ext Marcel Holtmann wrote: >> > It's just like most network protocols exposing their sockets list = in >> > /proc/net. Debugging/monitoring indeed. >> >> I think that for new protocols, we should not do this anymore and ju= st >> use debugfs. Since that is exactly its job. >=20 > Requiring debugfs for something like 'netstat' sounds restrictive to = me... Me too.