From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13760] New: 2.6.30 kernel locks up with pppoe in back trace (regression) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090723.091424.27847831.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090722134557.2457c5f5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <43d009740907222339n50ebe411ya6453dc5a294b9a0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51921 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754395AbZGWQOS (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:14:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <43d009740907222339n50ebe411ya6453dc5a294b9a0@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Igor M Podlesny Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:39:29 +0800 > Just repeating the same thing I had written in the Bugzilla: I > haven't noticed any changes to pppoe during last commits to 2.6.30. > Why do you think there's a chance that bug(s) would have been fixed? There were TTY layer changes that have an effect on PPP and the like.