From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 5/5] fcoe: Use NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU flag to set up max frame size (lport->mfs) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090726.094402.38463748.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1248373648.23392.24.camel@fritz> <20090723.114002.51085260.davem@davemloft.net> <1248374883.23392.31.camel@fritz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org, devel-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org, gospo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org To: robert.w.love-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1248374883.23392.31.camel@fritz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devel-bounces-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devel-bounces-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Robert Love Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:48:03 -0700 > Yes, absolutely, but it's only this small patch that creates the > dependency. I figured that all of the other fcoe patches could go into > James' scsi-misc tree and get merged first. Then this one could go into > his scsi-post-merge tree and depend on net-next. > > It's really up to you and James, I just thought that would be easier. So I tried to apply just the networking bits but none of the ixgbe parts apply properly to net-next-2.6, so this patch series will need to be respun and resubmitted in it's entirety so I can apply it properly. It seems that the ixgbe driver now maintains feature flags differently than whatever revision of the driver these patches were generated against.