From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] eexpress: Read buffer overflow Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:05:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20090729200517.GB3058@ami.dom.local> References: <20090729122953.GC5490@ff.dom.local> <4A704C40.1070606@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: Roel Kluin Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:38652 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755326AbZG2UFf (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:05:35 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so193246bwz.37 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A704C40.1070606@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:18:56PM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote: > start_code is 69 words, but the code always writes a multiple of 16 words, > so the last 11 words written are outside the array. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > --- > > Now you seem to make my previous math working :-) > > > >>> (max) i = 64, (max) j = 14, (64+14+16)/2 = 47 < 69, so it seems to copy > >>> less than its size? > > > > Jarek P. > > > > You're right, thanks for reviewing, this one should be correct. Looks OK to me. Thanks, Jarek P. > > diff --git a/drivers/net/eexpress.c b/drivers/net/eexpress.c > index 1686dca..1f016d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/eexpress.c > +++ b/drivers/net/eexpress.c > @@ -1474,13 +1474,13 @@ static void eexp_hw_init586(struct net_device *dev) > outw(0x0000, ioaddr + 0x800c); > outw(0x0000, ioaddr + 0x800e); > > - for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(start_code)); i+=32) { > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(start_code) * 2; i+=32) { > int j; > outw(i, ioaddr + SM_PTR); > - for (j = 0; j < 16; j+=2) > + for (j = 0; j < 16 && (i+j)/2 < ARRAY_SIZE(start_code); j+=2) > outw(start_code[(i+j)/2], > ioaddr+0x4000+j); > - for (j = 0; j < 16; j+=2) > + for (j = 0; j < 16 && (i+j+16)/2 < ARRAY_SIZE(start_code); j+=2) > outw(start_code[(i+j+16)/2], > ioaddr+0x8000+j); > }