netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Don Fry <pcnet32@verizon.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, eteo@redhat.com, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: VLB support fixes
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907302346.26017.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A721163.7030700@garzik.org>

On Thursday 30 July 2009 23:32:19 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] pcnet32: VLB support fixes
> > 
> > VLB support has been broken since at least 2004-2005 period as some
> > changes introduced back then assumed that ->pci_dev is always valid,
> > lets try to fix it:
> > 
> > - remove duplicated SET_NETDEV_DEV() call
> > 
> > - call SET_NETDEV_DEV() only for PCI devices
> > 
> > - check for ->pci_dev validity in pcnet32_open()
> > 
> > [ Alternatively we may consider removing VLB support but there would not
> >   be much gain in it since an extra driver code needed for VLB support is
> >   minimal and quite simple. ]
> > 
> > This takes care of the following entry from Dan's list:
> > 
> > drivers/net/pcnet32.c +1889 pcnet32_probe1(298) warning: variable derefenced before check 'pdev'
> > 
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> > Cc: corbet@lwn.net
> > Cc: eteo@redhat.com
> > Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > PS I still keep the original cc: list from the smatch thread -- please let
> > me know if you don't want to be spammed.. ;-)
> > 
> >  drivers/net/pcnet32.c |   12 +++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> ACK -- the patch is correct AFAICS -- but would it not be better to have 
> a struct device for the VLB device?

Sure, such addition would be needed for sysfs support on VLB devices..

> We have capability to create struct device for isa and eisa, so VLB is 
> quite doable.
> 
> 	Jeff, who converted old-ISDN ISA+EISA+PCI drivers to
> 	      hotplug model, once upon a time

..and it seems that you've the needed experience! :)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-30 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-30 21:17 [PATCH] pcnet32: VLB support fixes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-30 21:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-30 21:46   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-07-30 21:58     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-30 22:25       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-31 18:45 ` Don Fry
2009-08-02 19:30 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200907302346.26017.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=eteo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pcnet32@verizon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).