From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090803.201504.213691148.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090728.192247.247655474.davem@davemloft.net> <20090729023809.GA2218@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090729031548.GA2435@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, jarkao2@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39376 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932285AbZHDDO4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:14:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090729031548.GA2435@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Herbert Xu Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:15:48 +0800 > This can be done with a lockless ring buffer. Each CPU would > deposit its packets in a qdisc ringer buffer assigned to it. > The qdisc would then run on a single CPU harvesting all the > ring buffers in some fair manner. There was a recent posting (I think today) on lkml of a memory barrier based lockless queue, I think it was named kfifo, that could facilitate this.