From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] documentation: fix wrt. headers rename Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090805.202226.24204308.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1249457297-8355-2-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1249457297-8355-3-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1249457297-8355-4-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, slapin@ossfans.org, linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: dbaryshkov@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60287 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753867AbZHFDWS (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:22:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1249457297-8355-4-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:28:17 +0400 > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov What are you generating these patches against? > @@ -72,5 +72,4 @@ SoftMAC > We are going to provide intermediate layer implementing IEEE 802.15.4 MAC > in software. This is currently WIP. > > -See header include/net/ieee802154/mac802154.h and several drivers in > -drivers/ieee802154/ > +See header include/net/mac802154.h and several drivers in drivers/ieee802154/. In net-2.6, and in Linus's tree as well, that first sentence quoted has a typo, "implementing" is misspelled, but in whatever you're patching against the misspelling is fixed. Looking at your pull request: -------------------- The following changes since commit db71789c01ae7b641f83c5aa64e7df25122f4b28: David S. Miller (1): xfrm6: Fix xfrm6_policy.c build when SYSCTL disabled. -------------------- You're submitting these for net-next-2.6? Didn't we just go back and forth about trimming this patch series down to only pure bug fixes so that they could go into net-2.6? Given that, why are you generating this stuff against net-next-2.6? I'm tossing this entire series again, this is beyond frustrating.