From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-2.6 PATCH 2/2] e1000e: fix potential NVM corruption on ICH9 with 8K bank size
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:41:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090807174155.31114.81083.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090807174136.31114.96240.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
The bank offset was being incorrectly calculated on ICH9 parts with a bank
size of 8K (instead of the more common 4K bank) which would cause any NVM
writes to be done on the wrong address after switching from bank 1 to bank
0. Additionally, assume we are meant to use bank 0 if a valid bank is not
detected, and remove the unnecessary acquisition of the SW/FW/HW semaphore
when writing to the shadow ram version of the NVM image.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 50 ++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
index dd61e7e..99df2ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
@@ -338,10 +338,7 @@ static s32 e1000_init_nvm_params_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
{
struct e1000_nvm_info *nvm = &hw->nvm;
struct e1000_dev_spec_ich8lan *dev_spec = &hw->dev_spec.ich8lan;
- union ich8_hws_flash_status hsfsts;
- u32 gfpreg;
- u32 sector_base_addr;
- u32 sector_end_addr;
+ u32 gfpreg, sector_base_addr, sector_end_addr;
u16 i;
/* Can't read flash registers if the register set isn't mapped. */
@@ -375,20 +372,6 @@ static s32 e1000_init_nvm_params_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
/* Adjust to word count */
nvm->flash_bank_size /= sizeof(u16);
- /*
- * Make sure the flash bank size does not overwrite the 4k
- * sector ranges. We may have 64k allotted to us but we only care
- * about the first 2 4k sectors. Therefore, if we have anything less
- * than 64k set in the HSFSTS register, we will reduce the bank size
- * down to 4k and let the rest remain unused. If berasesz == 3, then
- * we are working in 64k mode. Otherwise we are not.
- */
- if (nvm->flash_bank_size > E1000_ICH8_SHADOW_RAM_WORDS) {
- hsfsts.regval = er16flash(ICH_FLASH_HSFSTS);
- if (hsfsts.hsf_status.berasesz != 3)
- nvm->flash_bank_size = E1000_ICH8_SHADOW_RAM_WORDS;
- }
-
nvm->word_size = E1000_ICH8_SHADOW_RAM_WORDS;
/* Clear shadow ram */
@@ -1324,7 +1307,7 @@ static s32 e1000_read_nvm_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
struct e1000_nvm_info *nvm = &hw->nvm;
struct e1000_dev_spec_ich8lan *dev_spec = &hw->dev_spec.ich8lan;
u32 act_offset;
- s32 ret_val;
+ s32 ret_val = 0;
u32 bank = 0;
u16 i, word;
@@ -1339,12 +1322,15 @@ static s32 e1000_read_nvm_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
goto out;
ret_val = e1000_valid_nvm_bank_detect_ich8lan(hw, &bank);
- if (ret_val)
- goto release;
+ if (ret_val) {
+ hw_dbg(hw, "Could not detect valid bank, assuming bank 0\n");
+ bank = 0;
+ }
act_offset = (bank) ? nvm->flash_bank_size : 0;
act_offset += offset;
+ ret_val = 0;
for (i = 0; i < words; i++) {
if ((dev_spec->shadow_ram) &&
(dev_spec->shadow_ram[offset+i].modified)) {
@@ -1359,7 +1345,6 @@ static s32 e1000_read_nvm_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
}
}
-release:
e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
out:
@@ -1610,7 +1595,6 @@ static s32 e1000_write_nvm_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
{
struct e1000_nvm_info *nvm = &hw->nvm;
struct e1000_dev_spec_ich8lan *dev_spec = &hw->dev_spec.ich8lan;
- s32 ret_val;
u16 i;
if ((offset >= nvm->word_size) || (words > nvm->word_size - offset) ||
@@ -1619,17 +1603,11 @@ static s32 e1000_write_nvm_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
return -E1000_ERR_NVM;
}
- ret_val = e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
- if (ret_val)
- return ret_val;
-
for (i = 0; i < words; i++) {
dev_spec->shadow_ram[offset+i].modified = 1;
dev_spec->shadow_ram[offset+i].value = data[i];
}
- e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1670,8 +1648,8 @@ static s32 e1000_update_nvm_checksum_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
*/
ret_val = e1000_valid_nvm_bank_detect_ich8lan(hw, &bank);
if (ret_val) {
- e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
- goto out;
+ hw_dbg(hw, "Could not detect valid bank, assuming bank 0\n");
+ bank = 0;
}
if (bank == 0) {
@@ -2057,12 +2035,8 @@ static s32 e1000_erase_flash_bank_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 bank)
iteration = 1;
break;
case 2:
- if (hw->mac.type == e1000_ich9lan) {
- sector_size = ICH_FLASH_SEG_SIZE_8K;
- iteration = flash_bank_size / ICH_FLASH_SEG_SIZE_8K;
- } else {
- return -E1000_ERR_NVM;
- }
+ sector_size = ICH_FLASH_SEG_SIZE_8K;
+ iteration = 1;
break;
case 3:
sector_size = ICH_FLASH_SEG_SIZE_64K;
@@ -2074,7 +2048,7 @@ static s32 e1000_erase_flash_bank_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 bank)
/* Start with the base address, then add the sector offset. */
flash_linear_addr = hw->nvm.flash_base_addr;
- flash_linear_addr += (bank) ? (sector_size * iteration) : 0;
+ flash_linear_addr += (bank) ? flash_bank_size : 0;
for (j = 0; j < iteration ; j++) {
do {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-07 17:41 [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] e1000e: fix acquisition of SW/FW/HW semaphore for ICHx parts Jeff Kirsher
2009-08-07 17:41 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2009-08-10 4:47 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 2/2] e1000e: fix potential NVM corruption on ICH9 with 8K bank size David Miller
2009-08-10 4:47 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] e1000e: fix acquisition of SW/FW/HW semaphore for ICHx parts David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090807174155.31114.81083.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).