From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [evb] Re: [PATCH][RFC] net/bridge: add basic VEPA support Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: <200908101723.10832.arnd@arndb.de> References: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E67D2DCECBB@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> <200908071329.44437.arnd@arndb.de> <005101ca1797$70dcf5b0$5296e110$@edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'Stephen Hemminger'" , "'Fischer, Anna'" , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, adobriyan@gmail.com, "'Or Gerlitz'" To: evb@yahoogroups.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <005101ca1797$70dcf5b0$5296e110$@edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 August 2009, Paul Congdon (UC Davis) wrote: > > I don't think your scheme works too well because broadcast packet coming > from other interfaces on br0 would get replicated and sent across the wire > to ethB multiple times. Right, that won't work. So the bridge patch for the hairpin turn is still the best solution. Btw, how will that interact with the bride-netfilter (ebtables) setup? Can you apply any filters that work on current bridges also between two VEPA ports while doing the hairpin turn? Arnd <><