From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: Add ftracer to help optimize process scheduling based on incomming frame allocations Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090812.221515.147337283.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090807202130.GA26677@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37325 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751657AbZHMFPF (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:15:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090807202130.GA26677@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Neil Horman Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:21:30 -0400 > Tested by me, working well, applies against the head of the net-next tree > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman For some reason they don't apply cleanly to net-next-2.6, probably because of the net-2.6 merge I did recently. Neil, could you please respin, and also could you please not use the same subject line for all 3 patches? That becomes the commit message header, and it should be unique for each patch since each patch does something different. :)