From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Daniel Slot <slot.daniel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4, linux-2.6.30.4
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:02:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090812120204.2e13163e@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb6e06c00908121150q6d08cdfdp818c26cd8ae4f064@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:50:59 +0200
Daniel Slot <slot.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:
> RFC 4653 specifies Non-Congestion Robustness (NCR) for TCP.
> In the absence of explicit congestion notification from the network,
> TCP uses loss as an indication of congestion.
> One of the ways TCP detects loss is using the arrival of three
> duplicate acknowledgments.
> However, this heuristic is not always correct, notably in the case
> when network paths reorder segments (for whatever reason), resulting
> in degraded performance.
> TCP-NCR is designed to mitigate this degraded performance by
> increasing the number of duplicate acknowledgments required to trigger
> loss recovery,
> based on the current state of the connection, in an effort to better
> disambiguate true segment loss from segment reordering.
> This document specifies the changes to TCP, as well as the costs and
> benefits of these modifications.
>
> This patch adds TCP-NCR as socket option to the Linux kernel (version 2.6.30.4).
> Written by Daniel Slot, Email: slot.daniel(at)gmail.com
Patch has funny indentation and awkward naming for socket elements.
Your style needs to match existing code.
What is the usage model for this? I expect that some user who wants
to enable this would be stuck somewhere with a lossy network and
would want to enable it. Or is it something only researchers will
want to play with?
It would be easier to use a sysctl value for this because otherwise
each application has to be changed to select the socket option.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-12 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-12 18:50 [PATCH] net/ipv4, linux-2.6.30.4 Daniel Slot
2009-08-12 19:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-08-12 19:27 ` Daniel Slot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-12 18:59 Daniel Slot
[not found] <bb6e06c00908121147h2dab7d0kf5841a40956c5c56@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-12 21:55 ` David Miller
2009-08-13 12:40 ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-08-13 20:13 ` David Miller
2009-08-13 20:15 ` David Miller
2009-08-14 11:52 ` Daniel Slot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090812120204.2e13163e@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slot.daniel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).