From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Zick" Subject: Re: AlacrityVM numbers updated for 31-rc4 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:05:54 -0500 Message-ID: <200908121706.32874.lkml@morethan.org> References: <4A83296B.3080606@gmail.com> <90eb1dc70908121433u3d5916efg5f0ef5994d6aa42c@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: lkml@MoreThan.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gregory Haskins , alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, alacrityvm-users@lists.sourceforge.net, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Guerra Return-path: In-Reply-To: <90eb1dc70908121433u3d5916efg5f0ef5994d6aa42c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed August 12 2009, Javier Guerra wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Gregory > Haskins wrote: > > In any case, I have updated the graphs on the AlacrityVM wiki to reflect > > these latest numbers: > > pseudo-3D charts are just wrong > (http://www.chuckchakrapani.com/articles/PDF/94070347.pdf) > Nice quote. Even 15 years after it was published, those first two graphs are prime "bad examples". The second two could stand some improvement also - like put the legend and numbers *on* each solid bar. @J.G. - I think you are fighting an uphill battle here against human nature. People tend to go with their idea of "pretty". Mike