From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses? Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090813.163133.199571497.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1250195675.28285.128.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <457D0D34-041E-43AE-BE31-241A19AA08B4@oracle.com> <1250198022.28285.133.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, brian.haley@hp.com, jens@mcbone.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: joe@perches.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:58769 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755673AbZHMXbW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:31:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1250198022.28285.133.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Joe Perches Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:13:42 -0700 > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:02 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> [ I would think user space in general should be using inet_pton(3) >> everywhere for such interfaces, so the format of these addresses >> wouldn't matter so much. Probably impossible at this point. ] > > David Miller is authoritative here. In the final analysis, the risk is just too high to break userspace. So let's play conservative here and not change the output for currently user visible stuff.