From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: Add ftracer to help optimize process scheduling based on incomming frame allocations Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:42:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20090813104204.GA16095@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20090807202130.GA26677@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20090812.221515.147337283.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:57873 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753179AbZHMKmL (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:42:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090812.221515.147337283.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:15:15PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Neil Horman > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:21:30 -0400 > > > Tested by me, working well, applies against the head of the net-next tree > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > > For some reason they don't apply cleanly to net-next-2.6, probably > because of the net-2.6 merge I did recently. > > Neil, could you please respin, and also could you please not > use the same subject line for all 3 patches? That becomes the > commit message header, and it should be unique for each patch > since each patch does something different. :) > > > Sure, no problem, I'll respin them all today and repost. Thanks! Neil