From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: fix premature termination of FIN_WAIT2 time-wait sockets
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:39:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908150339.12730.opurdila@ixiacom.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2262 bytes --]
NOTE: this issue has been found, fixed and tested on an ancient 2.6.7 kernel.
This patch is a blind port of that fix, since unfortunately there is no easy
way for me to reproduce the original issue with a newer kernel. But the issue
still seems to be there.
tavi
---
There is a race condition in the time-wait sockets code that can lead
to premature termination of FIN_WAIT2 and, subsequently, to RST
generation when the FIN,ACK from the peer finally arrives:
Time TCP header
0.000000 30755 > http [SYN] Seq=0 Win=2920 Len=0 MSS=1460 TSV=282912 TSER=0
0.000008 http > 30755 aSYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=2896 Len=0 MSS=1460 TSV=...
0.136899 HEAD /1b.html?n1Lg=v1 HTTP/1.0 [Packet size limited during capture]
0.136934 HTTP/1.0 200 OK [Packet size limited during capture]
0.136945 http > 30755 [FIN, ACK] Seq=187 Ack=207 Win=2690 Len=0 TSV=270521...
0.136974 30755 > http [ACK] Seq=207 Ack=187 Win=2734 Len=0 TSV=283049 TSER=...
0.177983 30755 > http [ACK] Seq=207 Ack=188 Win=2733 Len=0 TSV=283089 TSER=...
0.238618 30755 > http [FIN, ACK] Seq=207 Ack=188 Win=2733 Len=0 TSV=283151...
0.238625 http > 30755 [RST] Seq=188 Win=0 Len=0
Say twdr->slot = 1 and we are running inet_twdr_hangman and in this
instance inet_twdr_do_twkill_work returns 1. At that point we will
mark slot 1 and schedule inet_twdr_twkill_work. We will also make
twdr->slot = 2.
Next, a connection is closed and tcp_time_wait(TCP_FIN_WAIT2, timeo)
is called which will create a new FIN_WAIT2 time-wait socket and will
place it in the last to be reached slot, i.e. twdr->slot = 1.
At this point say inet_twdr_twkill_work will run which will start
destroying the time-wait sockets in slot 1, including the just added
TCP_FIN_WAIT2 one.
To avoid this issue we increment the slot only if all entries in the
slot have been purged.
This change may delay the slots cleanup by a time-wait death row
period but only if the worker thread didn't had the time to run/purge
the current slot in the next period (6 seconds with default sysctl
settings). However, on such a busy system even without this change we
would probably see delays...
Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
---
net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
[-- Attachment #2: b36bc8257b528fc8ce5d6e1eb988459f5c2be10d.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 551 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
index 61283f9..13f0781 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
@@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ void inet_twdr_hangman(unsigned long data)
/* We purged the entire slot, anything left? */
if (twdr->tw_count)
need_timer = 1;
+ twdr->slot = ((twdr->slot + 1) & (INET_TWDR_TWKILL_SLOTS - 1));
}
- twdr->slot = ((twdr->slot + 1) & (INET_TWDR_TWKILL_SLOTS - 1));
if (need_timer)
mod_timer(&twdr->tw_timer, jiffies + twdr->period);
out:
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-15 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-15 0:39 Octavian Purdila [this message]
2009-08-24 20:47 ` [PATCH] tcp: fix premature termination of FIN_WAIT2 time-wait sockets Octavian Purdila
2009-08-29 7:00 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908150339.12730.opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--to=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).