From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] lib/vsprintf.c: Add struct sockaddr * "%pN" output Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090819.212941.235652305.davem@davemloft.net> References: <6EE37F10-4354-49FE-9FF1-BB38BDD10E6E@oracle.com> <1250721391.3407.103.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1250742246.2000.4.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jens@mcbone.net, brian.haley@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: joe@perches.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55906 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138AbZHTE3a (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:29:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1250742246.2000.4.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Joe Perches Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:24:06 -0700 > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:36 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> > Having a hexadecimal port number option >> > might be more useful. The hexadecimal form is also used by the >> > kernel's RPC implementation, fwiw. >> >> Easy enough. > > Do you have an opinion on this style patch to lib/vsprint? > Where does it fall on the useless <-> desirable scale? Who me? I'm just following this thread loosely, and just plan to review it on a whole once things seem to quiet down and the major issues seem to be worked out. I really have no hard opinion on anything like this, sorry for the lack of feedback, I simply have none :)