From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: pgynther@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibm_newemac: emac_close() needs to call netif_carrier_off()
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:20:58 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090820.022058.160961745.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250748142.10937.4.camel@pasglop>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:02:22 +1000
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:32 -0700, Petri Gynther wrote:
>> Stephen,
>>
>> I think your suggestion of adding netif_running() check to
>> bond_check_dev_link() is valid and a good fix to the bonding driver.
>> We can do this in a separate patch.
>>
>> However, I think that the change to ibm_newemac: emac_close() is
>> needed as well. ibm_newemac netdevs should not return
>> netif_carrier_ok() == TRUE when they have been shut down.
>
> Well, we definitely don't do that in sungem either, since we continue
> the link polling while the interface is down... IE. interface up/down is
> the data path and is orthogonal to the PHY polling in sungem. I suppose
> we -could- stop the polling while the interface is down, though I think
> my initial implementation did only poll the link while the interface was
> up and that was causing endless problems with various laptop-net style
> tools (however that was years and years ago).
It just shows how few people use sungem with bonding :-)
Short term I'm going to add the ibm_newemac change.
Longer term we should probably add the netif_running() check to
bond_check_dev_link().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-19 21:00 [PATCH] ibm_newemac: emac_close() needs to call netif_carrier_off() Petri Gynther
2009-08-19 21:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-19 21:34 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 21:40 ` Petri Gynther
2009-08-19 22:32 ` Petri Gynther
2009-08-19 23:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-20 6:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-20 9:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-08-20 9:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090820.022058.160961745.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgynther@google.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).