From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:12:05 +0300 Message-ID: <20090820121205.GC5448@redhat.com> References: <20090814154308.26116.46980.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090815103243.GA26749@elte.hu> <4A870964.9090408@codemonkey.ws> <4A8965E0.8050608@gmail.com> <4A89FF08.30509@codemonkey.ws> <4A8AA9BD.2070909@gmail.com> <4A8AB076.6080906@redhat.com> <4A8ACE1F.6020402@gmail.com> <20090818165139.GC19846@redhat.com> <4A8B8F4E.80207@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , Ingo Molnar , Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A8B8F4E.80207@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:36:14AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> So where is the problem here? > > > > If virtio net in guest could be improved instead, everyone would > > benefit. > > So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant > connector, you are happy? I'm currently worried about venet versus virtio-net guest situation, if you drop it and switch to virtio net instead that issue's resolved. I don't have an opinion on vbus versus pci, and I only speak for myself. -- MST