From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:35:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20090827003536.GC30341@infradead.org> References: <20090826223922.GA25318@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20090826.154410.95005620.davem@davemloft.net> <20090826230514.GB31970@elte.hu> <20090826.160835.263085197.davem@davemloft.net> <20090826235826.GA430@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , nhorman@tuxdriver.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, billfink@mindspring.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, brice@myri.com, gallatin@myri.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:35719 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753608AbZH0Afk (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:35:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090826235826.GA430@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:58:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I'm sorry you got that impression, but you are a maintainer yourself > so you might perhaps understand it why sooner or later, if a > maintainer's review does not get acted upon, one has to insist on > clean patches in stronger terms. Cool down a bit :) While I totally agree with you on all the technical bits here I think a slightly nicer attitude towars Neil and Dave would help the cause a lot..