From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20090827092841.GC4260@elte.hu> References: <20090826223922.GA25318@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20090826.154410.95005620.davem@davemloft.net> <20090826230514.GB31970@elte.hu> <20090826.160835.263085197.davem@davemloft.net> <20090826235826.GA430@elte.hu> <20090827003536.GC30341@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , nhorman@tuxdriver.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, billfink@mindspring.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, brice@myri.com, gallatin@myri.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42418 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751946AbZH0J2y (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:28:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090827003536.GC30341@infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:58:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > I'm sorry you got that impression, but you are a maintainer > > yourself so you might perhaps understand it why sooner or later, > > if a maintainer's review does not get acted upon, one has to > > insist on clean patches in stronger terms. > > Cool down a bit :) [...] Hello Pot, Kettle here ;-) I guess i'll have to test the limits of your patience by queueing up some bad commit into fs/libfs.c via say the iommu tree, without acks and with commit log damage, which patch then triggers a build failure and a crash in linux-next (like this one did), and refuse to revert and not do anything substantial about your (initially polite) review feedback for 2 weeks (like it happened here), and see how measured your response will be after the 12th mail that gets faced with such passive-aggressive inaction ;-) At that point, will your wall of patience finally start to crumble a tiny bit and will you resort to using the taboo term 'crappy patch' perhaps, like i did here? ;-) Anyway, as Steve said it's now finally water under the bridge, time to move on. Ingo