From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090831.050220.255723045.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4A9B7956.40507@gmail.com> <4A9B94B8.4050808@gmail.com> <20090831093019.GI5005@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jarkao2@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51304 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750873AbZHaMCG (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:02:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090831093019.GI5005@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jarek Poplawski Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000 > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> From: Jarek Poplawski >> >> After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80 >> (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx) >> sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends >> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some > > Very nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling. I will :-)