From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:07:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090831070733.GC5005@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9B72B1.2040908@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:50:25AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:26:43AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> >>> After recent changes sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends
> >>> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some
> >>> cases sk_free() is called earlier, usually after other alloc errors.
> >>> This patch fixes it by exporting and using __sk_free() directly.
> > ...
> >> Very nice catch Jarek, but dont you think it would be cleaner to make sure
> >> we can call sk_free() right after sk_alloc() instead, and not exporting
> >> __sk_free() ?
> >>
> >> ie initialize wmem_alloc in sk_alloc() instead of initializing it in
> >> sock_init_data() ?
> >>
> >
> > Most probably it should be better. But I meant this fix for -net and
> > didn't wan't to break too much... So, if you're sure it's OK feel free
> > to send your version. (Or it could be changed like this in the -next.)
>
> Well, patch is yours, not mine, and I am confident it is OK.
Well, it's from you, and I guess you'll sign off too, but if you
think so...
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Jarek P.
>
> We should check that no sk_alloc() user did a blind memset() or something
> strange like that, before calling sock_init_data() or sk_free()
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index bbb25be..7633422 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1025,6 +1025,7 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
> sk->sk_prot = sk->sk_prot_creator = prot;
> sock_lock_init(sk);
> sock_net_set(sk, get_net(net));
> + atomic_set(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
> }
>
> return sk;
> @@ -1872,7 +1873,6 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
> */
> smp_wmb();
> atomic_set(&sk->sk_refcnt, 1);
> - atomic_set(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
> atomic_set(&sk->sk_drops, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_init_data);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-31 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-30 22:23 [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 6:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 6:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 7:07 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-08-31 7:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 7:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 9:15 ` [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 9:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 12:02 ` David Miller
2009-08-31 12:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 0:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090831070733.GC5005@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).