From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 1/3] netxen: fix lro buffer allocation Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090903.203355.227030741.davem@davemloft.net> References: <7608421F3572AB4292BB2532AE89D565865FA8A556@AVEXMB1.qlogic.org> <20090903.201537.26653675.davem@davemloft.net> <7608421F3572AB4292BB2532AE89D565865FA8A557@AVEXMB1.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dhananjay.phadke@qlogic.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35394 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753256AbZIDDdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:33:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7608421F3572AB4292BB2532AE89D565865FA8A557@AVEXMB1.qlogic.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Dhananjay Phadke Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:24:15 -0700 >> But if the page allocator can't satisfy allocation requests >> it doesn't matter how many microseconds you're saving here. >> >> I think you're priorities are backwards. > > Ok whatever. Whether I request 9k or 12k, page allocator > is digging 16k chunks. > > When there's enough memory, every cycle saved is important > for firmware. I would love to enable fragmented rx, if it's > not affecting throughput. Ok. Just FYI I won't be surprised if SLAB/SLUB/SLQB at some point handle this situation differently.