From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: skb header allocation Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:23:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20090903162344.108374cb@nehalam> References: <17cd85320908252004r31874732n9e06921d6eae4ad7@mail.gmail.com> <20090825201514.0dd143ad@nehalam> <4A94CFB3.4020706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Ross , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Frank Blaschka Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:44902 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756569AbZICXXs (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:23:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A94CFB3.4020706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:01:23 +0200 Frank Blaschka wrote: > Is it save to change dev->hard_header_len to a value other than ETH_HLEN for > an ethernet device? > > I rememeber we run in trouble with some kernel components (netfilter?, I'm > not sure can't remember the details ...) when we did this is the past. > You can add extra data but need a minimum with ETH_HLEN of space above packet when receiving. --