From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] can: add can_free_echo_skb() for upcoming drivers Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090904.021350.234672852.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4A9D3D14.90201@grandegger.com> <20090903.204641.193482962.davem@davemloft.net> <4AA0C692.5000003@grandegger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de, oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de To: wg@grandegger.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46863 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933051AbZIDJNf (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:13:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AA0C692.5000003@grandegger.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Wolfgang Grandegger Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:49:38 +0200 > David Miller wrote: >> Can a CAN expert please review these patches? They are rotting >> in patchwork and I want to move forward with them somehow.I' > > I'm maintaining the CAN device drivers interface and drivers as listed > in MAINTAINERS. Though, these patches have already the official blessing. My bad :-) I'll apply these then. > Do you want me to setup a git repository "can-next-2.6" where you can > pull from? So far, not that much can-drv patches have been posted to > this list. You can do that in the future if you like, sure. But it is not a requirement, as with the rate you guys send things I am handling it efficiently using patchwork.