From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@voltaire.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: export underlying socket
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:10:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914101012.GA14176@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AAE1026.4090702@voltaire.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:43:02PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> That's already possible. However virtualization users are familiar
>> with configuring the tun device, and tun has grown
>> virtualization-specific extensions, so I don't see a reason not to
>> accomodate these uses
> Today packets are written/read from/to Qemu to/from tun device, how
> would the use case with vhost will look like?
- Configure bridge and tun using existing scripts
- pass tun fd to vhost via an ioctl
- vhost calls tun_get_socket
- from this point, guest networking just goes faster
> Is this the user setting an uplink NIC + bridge + per VM tun device but
> the packets will go from/to virtio-net in the guest kernel to/from vhost
> in the host kernel and then from/to vhost to/from tun? so eventually no
> packets will be seen by the qemu process? I don't see what these scheme
> buys people, I got very much confused.
>
> Or.
A lot of people have asked for tun support in vhost, because qemu
currently uses tun. With this scheme existing code and scripts can be
used to configure both tun and bridge. You also can utilize
virtualization-specific features in tun.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 12:59 [PATCH RFC] tun: export underlying socket Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-10 13:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-10 13:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-11 4:17 ` Paul Moore
2009-09-11 4:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-11 5:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-11 6:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-11 9:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-14 8:01 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-14 8:07 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-14 8:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-14 8:17 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-14 9:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-14 9:43 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-14 10:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-09-14 14:06 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-14 15:03 ` Herbert Xu
2009-09-15 13:02 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-15 13:31 ` Herbert Xu
2009-09-14 15:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-15 13:11 ` Or Gerlitz
2009-09-15 13:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-02 17:20 ` [PATCHv2] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-11-03 15:10 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090914101012.GA14176@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@voltaire.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).