From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Nir Tzachar <nir.tzachar@gmail.com>,
Linux Networking Development Mailing List
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Ziv Ayalon <ziv@final.co.il>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [RFC v3] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:52:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916115218.GK22743@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090916045333.GA18325@verge.net.au>
Em Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:53:44PM +1000, Simon Horman escreveu:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:52:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:20:13PM +0300, Nir Tzachar escreveu:
> > > >> Setup:
> > > >> linux 2.6.29.2 with the third version of the patch, running on an
> > > >> Intel Xeon X3220 2.4GHz quad core, with 4Gbyte of ram, running Ubuntu
> > > >> 9.04
> > > >
> > > > Which NIC? 10 Gbit/s?
> > >
> > > 1G. We do not care as much for throughput as we do about latency...
> >
> > OK, but anyway the 10 Gbit/s cards I've briefly played with all
> > exhibited lower latencies than all 1 gbit/s ones, in fact I've heard
> > about people moving to 10 Gbit/s not for the bw, but for the lower
> > latencies :-)
>
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> Out of curiosity, is that using a 10Gbit card with
> a 10Gbit link or a 1Gbit link?
Its been a while, but most details should be publicly available here:
http://www.stacresearch.com/node/4211
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9b2db90b0908060014r6a1763e8t1b3ee9310e012c25@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-06 7:15 ` Fwd: [RFC v3] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall Nir Tzachar
2009-09-14 23:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-09-15 8:37 ` Nir Tzachar
2009-09-15 14:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-09-15 18:20 ` Nir Tzachar
2009-09-15 20:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-09-16 4:53 ` Simon Horman
2009-09-16 11:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916115218.GK22743@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nir.tzachar@gmail.com \
--cc=ziv@final.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).