netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] 3c59x: Get rid of "Trying to free already-free IRQ"
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:56:16 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090925125616.GA20863@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909251432.30738.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:32:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 25 September 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > 
> > > Though, there are few other issues with suspend/resume in this driver.
> > > The intention of calling free_irq() in suspend() was to avoid any
> > > possible spurious interrupts (see commit 5b039e681b8c5f30aac9cc04385
> > > "3c59x PM fixes"). But,
> > > 
> > > - On resume, the driver was requesting IRQ just after pci_set_master(),
> > >   but before vortex_up() (which actually resets 3c59x chips).
> > 
> > Shouldn't it be possible to reset the chip (or at least prevent it from 
> > generating spurious IRQs) during the early-resume phase?
> > 
> > > - Issuing free_irq() on a shared IRQ doesn't guarantee that a buggy
> > >   HW won't trigger spurious interrupts in another driver that
> > >   requested the same interrupt. So, if we want to protect from
> > >   unexpected interrupts, then on suspend we should issue disable_irq(),
> > >   not free_irq().
> > 
> > What if some other device shares the IRQ and still relies on receiving
> > interrupts when this code runs?  Won't disable_irq() mess up the other
> > device?
> 
> Ah, I overlooked the disable_irq()/enable_irq() part, which is not really
> necessary anyway.

Well, it is necessary if 3c59x really throws spurious interrupts
upon suspend (i.e. after pci_disable_device(pdev)). My first though
was to just remove free/request_irq stuff, but then I could introduce
a regression if 3c59x really throws unexpected IRQs and 3c59x was
the only user of a PCI IRQ (in that case free_irq() would actually
help).

> Anton, have you tried without that?

Yes, and there wasn't any issues for 3x59x I have. Alan raised a very
good point, and converting to dev_pm_opsas as you've suggested would
solve it in a nice way, since if we use the dev_pm_ops, PCI core
will disable the device in _noirq suspend, after we quiesced the
chip itself.

I'll send another patch that reworks PM stuff in the driver soon.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-25 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-24 18:31 [PATCH] 3c59x: Get rid of "Trying to free already-free IRQ" Anton Vorontsov
2009-09-24 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-24 21:30   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-09-24 22:26     ` David Miller
2009-09-25 12:35       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-24 22:47 ` David Miller
2009-09-25  4:43 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2009-09-25 12:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-25 12:56     ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-09-25 13:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090925125616.GA20863@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).